首页> 外文OA文献 >Contracting out: Dutch municipalities reject the solution for the VAT-distortion
【2h】

Contracting out: Dutch municipalities reject the solution for the VAT-distortion

机译:外包:荷兰市政当局拒绝增值税扭曲的解决方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2003, the Dutch government introduced a VAT-compensation fund in order to create a level playing field for local governments with respect to Value Added Tax (VAT). This fund eliminates the effect of the tax difference between local governments that supply services themselves and local governments that contract out services to the private sector. However, as this article shows, according to most municipalities, differences in their treatment in terms of VAT did not hinder the contracting out of public services. Therefore, the VAT compensation fund lacks legitimacy. It appears to have had little effect so far, as the number of contracted-out public services has hardly increased since its introduction. In general, municipalities have a negative opinion of the fund. They state that non-budgetary effects and institutional considerations, such as the quality of services, the vulnerability of municipal activities and concern for employment in the municipality itself, are more relevant to decision making on outsourcing. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.
机译:2003年,荷兰政府引入了增值税补偿基金,以便为地方政府在增值税(VAT)方面创造一个公平的竞争环境。该基金消除了自行提供服务的地方政府与将服务外包给私营部门的地方政府之间税收差异的影响。但是,正如本文所显示的那样,根据大多数市政当局的说法,其在增值税方面的待遇差异并不妨碍公共服务外包。因此,增值税补偿基金缺乏合法性。迄今为止,它似乎没有什么效果,因为自引入以来,外包服务的数量几乎没有增加。一般而言,市政当局对该基金持负面看法。他们指出,非预算影响和机构考虑,例如服务质量,市政活动的脆弱性以及市政当局本身对就业的关注,与外包决策更加相关。 ©2010泰勒和弗朗西斯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号